
Capital.com

Axi
من يتفوق في أي جانب
خمس جولات، حقيقة قابلة للتحقق لكل جولة
الجولة تُحسم للوسيط الأفضل في المعيار المحدد. إذا تساوت الأرقام، تُعتبر الجولة تعادلاً — لا نخترع فائزين.
Cost
Decided by the tighter EUR/USD spread. Lower typical spread on the tightest retail account wins.
Trust
Decided by the count of Tier-1 licences. More Tier-1 regulators means stronger client-money protection.
Access
Decided by the lower minimum deposit. A lower bar to entry wins.
Platforms
Decided by the breadth of terminals offered. More supported trading platforms wins.
Record
Decided by the longer operating history. A longer operating record wins.
Axi edges it, 2–1
Capital.com and Axi share common ground in regulatory compliance and platform offerings for certain regions, both providing a maximum retail leverage of 1:30 under FCA/ASIC oversight. Both also integrate with TradingView. However, their headline figures present distinct propositions. Capital.com quotes a typical EUR/USD spread of 0.6 pips with a $20 minimum deposit, holding two tier-1 and three tier-2 licences. Axi, conversely, offers a 0.7 pips spread and a $0 minimum deposit, backed by two tier-1 and two tier-2 licences.
In the trust round, Capital.com gains a slight edge with a total of five active licences (two tier-1, three tier-2) compared to Axi's four (two tier-1, two tier-2). Both possess strong FCA and ASIC tier-1 regulatory oversight, providing comparable security. For costs, Capital.com presents a tighter typical EUR/USD spread at 0.6 pips versus Axi's 0.7 pips, suggesting marginally better pricing on this metric. Axi, however, facilitates entry with a $0 minimum deposit, significantly lower than Capital.com's $20, making it more accessible for new traders.
Capital.com secures the advantage in typical spread and overall licence count, offering a slightly more regulated and potentially cheaper trading environment for the EUR/USD pair. Axi's zero minimum deposit, however, makes it a more accessible choice for those new to trading or wishing to start with minimal capital. The regulatory strength of both brokers is substantial with dual tier-1 licences. Considering the combined factors, Capital.com's marginally better spread and additional tier-2 licence tip the balance slightly in its favour for a broader appeal, though Axi remains a strong contender for cost-conscious new entrants.
المواجهة التالية
مقارنات مباشرة أخرى
Pepperstone مقابل IC Markets
Australia's two raw-spread specialists, fact by fact
XM مقابل Exness
Two low-deposit giants weighed on cost and cover
OANDA مقابل FOREX.com
Two of the most heavily regulated names, compared
FxPro مقابل Pepperstone
London platform depth against Melbourne's tighter quote