EnglishEN
fxbout.comTrust trade-offsFind my broker in 60s
Home/Matchups/Capital.com vs Axi

Capital.com vs Axi

Capital.com vs Axi: Regulatory Strength and Cost Efficiency.. Nine attributes, each decided by a single publicly checkable figure, with the winner marked on the side that takes it.

1 Capital.com2 drawn2 Axi
Capital.com logo

Capital.com

London, UK · est. 2016 · 2× Tier-1

VS
Axi logo

Axi

Sydney, Australia · est. 2007 · 2× Tier-1

W0.60 pips
EUR/USD spread
0.70 pips
$20
Minimum deposit
No minimumW
2 of 6 live licences
Tier-1 licences
2 of 5 live licences
WFCA, CySEC, CySEC, ASIC, SCA, SCB
Regulatory reach
ASIC, FCA, DFSA, FMA New Zealand, FSA Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
Capital.com proprietary web platform, MT4 (selected entities), TradingView, Mobile apps
Platform choice
MT4, MT5, Axi app, TradingView
Retail CFD, Spread betting (UK), Professional
Account tiers
Standard, Pro, Elite
10 yrs (est. 2016)
Years trading
19 yrs (est. 2007)W
1:30 (UK/EU retail)
Maximum leverage
1:30 retail under FCA/ASIC; higher under international entities
London, UK
Headquarters
Sydney, Australia

Who wins on what

Five rounds, one checkable fact apiece

A round goes to whichever broker is ahead on its deciding figure. Where the figures match, the round is drawn — we do not invent a winner.

RoundCapital.comAxiTaken by
Cost0.60 pips0.70 pipsCapital.com
Trust2 of 6 live licences2 of 5 live licencesDrawn
Access$20No minimumAxi
PlatformsCapital.com proprietary web platform, MT4 (selected entities), TradingView, Mobile appsMT4, MT5, Axi app, TradingViewDrawn
Record10 yrs (est. 2016)19 yrs (est. 2007)Axi
01

Cost

Decided by the tighter EUR/USD spread. Lower typical spread on the tightest retail account wins.

Capital.com
02

Trust

Decided by the count of Tier-1 licences. More Tier-1 regulators means stronger client-money protection.

Drawn
03

Access

Decided by the lower minimum deposit. A lower bar to entry wins.

Axi
04

Platforms

Decided by the breadth of terminals offered. More supported trading platforms wins.

Drawn
05

Record

Decided by the longer operating history. A longer operating record wins.

Axi
Verdict

Axi edges it, 2–1

Axi ahead of Capital.com on the computed rounds

Capital.com and Axi share common ground in regulatory compliance and platform offerings for certain regions, both providing a maximum retail leverage of 1:30 under FCA/ASIC oversight. Both also integrate with TradingView. However, their headline figures present distinct propositions. Capital.com quotes a typical EUR/USD spread of 0.6 pips with a $20 minimum deposit, holding two tier-1 and three tier-2 licences. Axi, conversely, offers a 0.7 pips spread and a $0 minimum deposit, backed by two tier-1 and two tier-2 licences.

In the trust round, Capital.com gains a slight edge with a total of five active licences (two tier-1, three tier-2) compared to Axi's four (two tier-1, two tier-2). Both possess strong FCA and ASIC tier-1 regulatory oversight, providing comparable security. For costs, Capital.com presents a tighter typical EUR/USD spread at 0.6 pips versus Axi's 0.7 pips, suggesting marginally better pricing on this metric. Axi, however, facilitates entry with a $0 minimum deposit, significantly lower than Capital.com's $20, making it more accessible for new traders.

Capital.com secures the advantage in typical spread and overall licence count, offering a slightly more regulated and potentially cheaper trading environment for the EUR/USD pair. Axi's zero minimum deposit, however, makes it a more accessible choice for those new to trading or wishing to start with minimal capital. The regulatory strength of both brokers is substantial with dual tier-1 licences. Considering the combined factors, Capital.com's marginally better spread and additional tier-2 licence tip the balance slightly in its favour for a broader appeal, though Axi remains a strong contender for cost-conscious new entrants.