IC Markets
XM
Who wins on what
Five rounds, one checkable fact apiece
A round goes to whichever broker is ahead on its deciding figure. Where the figures match, the round is drawn — we do not invent a winner.
Cost
Decided by the tighter EUR/USD spread. Lower typical spread on the tightest retail account wins.
Trust
Decided by the count of Tier-1 licences. More Tier-1 regulators means stronger client-money protection.
Access
Decided by the lower minimum deposit. A lower bar to entry wins.
Platforms
Decided by the breadth of terminals offered. More supported trading platforms wins.
Record
Decided by the longer operating history. A longer operating record wins.
IC Markets edges it, 3–1
IC Markets and XM sit at opposite ends of the same market. IC Markets is a raw-spread specialist quoting EUR/USD from 0.62 pips, aimed at traders who care about execution quality and run volume through cTrader. XM is a mass-market broker that will open an account for $5 and offers Standard, Ultra Low and Zero tiers to suit almost anyone.
Both lean on ASIC for their Tier-1 cover — IC Markets adds CySEC and an offshore Seychelles arm, XM adds CySEC, DFSA and an offshore Belize licence — so on regulation the two are effectively matched at a single Tier-1 licence each. Platform choice slightly favours IC Markets, which adds cTrader to the MT4/MT5 pairing that both share.
The decision is a straight trade-off between cost of trading and cost of entry. IC Markets wins the fees round on the tighter 0.62 pip spread and edges the platform question with cTrader; XM wins accessibility comfortably with a $5 minimum against IC Markets' $200. If you are funding a serious account and value execution, IC Markets is the pick; if you want to start small and learn, XM's low bar is the sensible on-ramp.
Next matchup
Other head-to-heads
Pepperstone vs IC Markets
Australia's two raw-spread specialists, fact by fact
XM vs Exness
Two low-deposit giants weighed on cost and cover
OANDA vs FOREX.com
Two of the most heavily regulated names, compared
FxPro vs Pepperstone
London platform depth against Melbourne's tighter quote