BrokerVersusFind my broker in 60s
Home/Matchups/Pepperstone vs IC Markets

Pepperstone vs IC Markets

Australia's two raw-spread specialists, fact by fact. Nine attributes, each decided by a single publicly checkable figure, with the winner marked on the side that takes it.

4 Pepperstone0 drawn1 IC Markets
Pepperstone logo

Pepperstone

Melbourne, Australia · est. 2010 · 3× Tier-1

VS
IC Markets logo

IC Markets

Sydney, Australia · est. 2007 · 1× Tier-1

W0.60 pips
EUR/USD spread
0.62 pips
WNo minimum
Minimum deposit
$200
W3 of 7 licences
Tier-1 licences
1 of 3 licences
WFCA, ASIC, CySEC, BaFin, DFSA, CMA, SCB
Regulatory reach
ASIC, CySEC, FSA
WMT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView
Platform choice
MT4, MT5, cTrader
Standard, Razor
Account tiers
Standard, Raw Spread
16 yrs (est. 2010)
Years trading
19 yrs (est. 2007)W
1:30 (retail, EU/UK)
Maximum leverage
1:30 (retail) / 1:500 (offshore)
Melbourne, Australia
Headquarters
Sydney, Australia

Who wins on what

Five rounds, one checkable fact apiece

A round goes to whichever broker is ahead on its deciding figure. Where the figures match, the round is drawn — we do not invent a winner.

RoundPepperstoneIC MarketsTaken by
Cost0.60 pips0.62 pipsPepperstone
Trust3 of 7 licences1 of 3 licencesPepperstone
AccessNo minimum$200Pepperstone
PlatformsMT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingViewMT4, MT5, cTraderPepperstone
Record16 yrs (est. 2010)19 yrs (est. 2007)IC Markets
01

Cost

Decided by the tighter EUR/USD spread. Lower typical spread on the tightest retail account wins.

Pepperstone
02

Trust

Decided by the count of Tier-1 licences. More Tier-1 regulators means stronger client-money protection.

Pepperstone
03

Access

Decided by the lower minimum deposit. A lower bar to entry wins.

Pepperstone
04

Platforms

Decided by the breadth of terminals offered. More supported trading platforms wins.

Pepperstone
05

Record

Decided by the longer operating history. A longer operating record wins.

IC Markets
Verdict

Pepperstone edges it, 4–1

Pepperstone ahead of IC Markets on the computed rounds

Pepperstone and IC Markets grew up in the same Australian raw-spread tradition, and on execution the two are genuinely close. Both quote EUR/USD from roughly six-tenths of a pip on their tightest accounts, both run MT4, MT5 and cTrader, and both are built around the ECN-style pricing that active traders ask for. The separators are regulation and entry cost, not the trading engine.

Pepperstone holds the wider regulatory spread — FCA in the UK, ASIC in Australia and BaFin in Germany all sit in Tier-1 — where IC Markets leans mainly on its ASIC licence with CySEC and an offshore Seychelles arm behind it. Pepperstone also lets you open with no minimum deposit, while IC Markets asks for $200 to start. For a UK or EU trader who wants the strongest home-regulator cover and a low bar to entry, that combination is hard to look past.

IC Markets earns its following on raw pricing and deep liquidity, and traders running high volume through cTrader will find little to complain about. But on the facts that decide this page — more Tier-1 licences and a $0 minimum — Pepperstone takes the fees and trust rounds, and the accessibility round is a dead heat only because both platforms are otherwise so similar.