Bahasa IndonesiaID
fxbout.comPertukaran kepercayaanTemukan broker Anda dalam 60 detik
Beranda/Perbandingan/Saxo Bank vs IUX (IUX Markets)

Saxo Bank vs IUX (IUX Markets)

Saxo Bank vs IUX: Established regulation meets offshore leverage.. Sembilan atribut, masing-masing ditentukan oleh satu angka yang dapat diperiksa publik, dengan pemenang ditandai di sisi yang mengambilnya.

4 Saxo Bank1 seri0 IUX (IUX Markets)
Saxo Bank logo

Saxo Bank

Hellerup (Copenhagen), Denmark · didirikan 1992 · 5× Tier-1

VS
IUX (IUX Markets) logo

IUX (IUX Markets)

Ebene Cybercity, Mauritius · didirikan 2016 · 1× Tier-1

0.90 pips
EUR/USD spread
0.90 pips
WNo minimum
Minimum deposit
$200
W5 of 5 live licences
Lisensi Tier-1
1 of 4 live licences
WDanish FSA, FCA, FINMA, MAS, FSA Japan
Regulatory reach
ASIC, FSCA, FSC Mauritius, FSA Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Mwali International Services Authority (MISA), Comoros
WSaxoTraderGO, SaxoTraderPRO, SaxoInvestor, Mobile apps
Platform choice
MT5, IUX web platform, IUX mobile app
Classic, Platinum, VIP
Tingkatan akun
Standard, Pro, Raw, CentW
W34 yrs (est. 1992)
Years trading
10 yrs (est. 2016)
1:30 (UK/EU retail)
Maximum leverage
up to 1:3000 (offshore entities; Raw and Pro accounts)
Hellerup (Copenhagen), Denmark
Headquarters
Ebene Cybercity, Mauritius

Siapa menang dalam hal apa

Lima ronde, satu fakta terverifikasi per ronde

Satu putaran diberikan kepada broker yang unggul berdasarkan angka penentunya. Jika angkanya cocok, putaran dianggap seri — kami tidak mengarang pemenang.

RondeSaxo BankIUX (IUX Markets)Diambil oleh
Cost0.90 pips0.90 pipsDrawn
Trust5 of 5 live licences1 of 4 live licencesSaxo Bank
AccessNo minimum$200Saxo Bank
PlatformsSaxoTraderGO, SaxoTraderPRO, SaxoInvestor, Mobile appsMT5, IUX web platform, IUX mobile appSaxo Bank
Record34 yrs (est. 1992)10 yrs (est. 2016)Saxo Bank
01

Cost

Decided by the tighter EUR/USD spread. Lower typical spread on the tightest retail account wins.

Seri
02

Trust

Decided by the count of Tier-1 licences. More Tier-1 regulators means stronger client-money protection.

Saxo Bank
03

Access

Decided by the lower minimum deposit. A lower bar to entry wins.

Saxo Bank
04

Platforms

Decided by the breadth of terminals offered. More supported trading platforms wins.

Saxo Bank
05

Record

Decided by the longer operating history. A longer operating record wins.

Saxo Bank
Kesimpulan

Saxo Bank edges it, 4–0

Saxo Bank ahead of IUX (IUX Markets) on the computed rounds

Both Saxo Bank and IUX offer a typical EUR/USD spread of 0.9 pips, positioning them competitively on a headline cost metric. However, their operational models and target demographics diverge significantly. Saxo Bank, established in 1992, operates from Denmark, providing a minimum deposit of $0 and a maximum leverage of 1:30 for UK/EU retail clients. IUX, founded in 2016 and headquartered in Mauritius, requires a $200 minimum deposit but extends leverage up to 1:3000 through its offshore entities. This distinction highlights a fundamental difference in their risk exposure offerings.

Saxo Bank presents a stronger regulatory profile with 5 active tier-1 licences and no tier-2 licences, indicating broad, high-level oversight across multiple jurisdictions. IUX holds 1 active tier-1 licence and 1 active tier-2 licence, alongside a tier-3 licence from FSC Mauritius. It is also noted that the FSA Saint Vincent and the Grenadines registration for IUX Markets Limited is for company registration only, not an investment licence. Regarding costs, Saxo Bank's $0 minimum deposit is more accessible than IUX's $200, despite both sharing the 0.9 pips EUR/USD spread.

Saxo Bank clearly takes the trust round due to its extensive tier-1 regulatory coverage and longer operational history. Its zero minimum deposit also grants it the accessibility round. IUX, while matching the spread, caters to traders seeking very high leverage, which Saxo Bank does not offer to retail clients under stricter regulations. For traders prioritising robust tier-1 regulation and minimal entry barriers, Saxo Bank is the stronger proposition. Those seeking extreme leverage, accepting the associated regulatory compromise, might consider IUX.