
Saxo Bank

IUX (IUX Markets)
ใครชนะในด้านใด
ห้ารอบ รอบละหนึ่งข้อเท็จจริงที่ตรวจสอบได้
รอบนั้นจะตกเป็นของโบรกเกอร์ที่นำหน้าในตัวเลขตัดสิน. หากตัวเลขตรงกัน รอบนั้นจะถือว่าเสมอ — เราไม่สร้างผู้ชนะขึ้นมาเอง.
Cost
Decided by the tighter EUR/USD spread. Lower typical spread on the tightest retail account wins.
Trust
Decided by the count of Tier-1 licences. More Tier-1 regulators means stronger client-money protection.
Access
Decided by the lower minimum deposit. A lower bar to entry wins.
Platforms
Decided by the breadth of terminals offered. More supported trading platforms wins.
Record
Decided by the longer operating history. A longer operating record wins.
Saxo Bank edges it, 4–0
Both Saxo Bank and IUX offer a typical EUR/USD spread of 0.9 pips, positioning them competitively on a headline cost metric. However, their operational models and target demographics diverge significantly. Saxo Bank, established in 1992, operates from Denmark, providing a minimum deposit of $0 and a maximum leverage of 1:30 for UK/EU retail clients. IUX, founded in 2016 and headquartered in Mauritius, requires a $200 minimum deposit but extends leverage up to 1:3000 through its offshore entities. This distinction highlights a fundamental difference in their risk exposure offerings.
Saxo Bank presents a stronger regulatory profile with 5 active tier-1 licences and no tier-2 licences, indicating broad, high-level oversight across multiple jurisdictions. IUX holds 1 active tier-1 licence and 1 active tier-2 licence, alongside a tier-3 licence from FSC Mauritius. It is also noted that the FSA Saint Vincent and the Grenadines registration for IUX Markets Limited is for company registration only, not an investment licence. Regarding costs, Saxo Bank's $0 minimum deposit is more accessible than IUX's $200, despite both sharing the 0.9 pips EUR/USD spread.
Saxo Bank clearly takes the trust round due to its extensive tier-1 regulatory coverage and longer operational history. Its zero minimum deposit also grants it the accessibility round. IUX, while matching the spread, caters to traders seeking very high leverage, which Saxo Bank does not offer to retail clients under stricter regulations. For traders prioritising robust tier-1 regulation and minimal entry barriers, Saxo Bank is the stronger proposition. Those seeking extreme leverage, accepting the associated regulatory compromise, might consider IUX.
การจับคู่ถัดไป
การปะทะอื่นๆ
Pepperstone vs IC Markets
Australia's two raw-spread specialists, fact by fact
XM vs Exness
Two low-deposit giants weighed on cost and cover
OANDA vs FOREX.com
Two of the most heavily regulated names, compared
FxPro vs Pepperstone
London platform depth against Melbourne's tighter quote