Skip to content

Interactive Brokers — where it wins, where it loses

Interactive Brokers wins on entry cost. No column in our set puts it behind the field. Its cost per ten lots is not confirmed, so it is left out of the cost ordering rather than estimated.

n/vCost per 10 lots — not confirmed, so not compared
n/vEUR/USD figure the comparison is priced from
2Tier-1 entries of 2 licence rows
None (as advertised by Interactive Brokers, 2026-10 · source)Minimum to open, where the broker states one

Column by column

The split

Two lists, no averaging. A broker that takes a column outright appears on the left of it; one that gets beaten on a column appears on the right. Nothing is scored into a single number, because a single number hides which side you actually care about.

Wins on

  • entry cost

Loses on

No column in this set puts Interactive Brokers behind the field.

Cost per 10 lots is the EUR/USD spread cost of ten round-turn standard lots at the figure above, commission excluded. Where a broker publishes a "from" spread rather than an average, the comparison inherits that limitation — see the unconfirmed list further down.

Licensing

Which entity, which regulator, which number

Tier decides how much weight a licence carries in any safety column. Each row links to the page it was read from.

Interactive Brokers — licence rows on file
RegulatorNumberJurisdictionTierEntityRead from
Financial Conduct Authority (UK)208159GBTier 1entity not examinedregister.fca.org.uk
Securities and Exchange Commission (US)8-47257USTier 1entity not examinedsec.gov

Checkable

Facts the comparison runs on

On the record

  • Interactive Brokers traces its origins to 1978 and is headquartered in Greenwich, Connecticut.
  • Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. is listed on Nasdaq under the ticker IBKR and is a component of the S&P 500.
  • ASIC's media release dated 20 September 2023 states that Interactive Brokers Australia Pty Ltd (ACN 166 929 568) paid a $832,500 penalty to comply with an infringement notice from the Market Disciplinary Panel; ASIC reports the MDP findings and notes that compliance with the notice is not an admission of guilt or liability (https://www.asic.gov.au/about-asic/news-centre/find-a-media-release/2023-releases/23-255mr-interactive-brokers-pays-832-500-penalty-for-negligent-and-reckless-conduct).
  • Interactive Brokers: deposit as advertised by the firm, 2026-10 (https://www.interactivebrokers.co.uk/en/accounts/required-minimums.php)
  • Interactive Brokers: software as advertised by the firm, 2026-10 (https://www.interactivebrokers.co.uk/en/trading/trading-platforms.php)
Comparison inputs
Trading sincenot verified
Basenot verified
Minimum to openNone (as advertised by Interactive Brokers, 2026-10 · source)
Leverage capnot examined
EUR/USDnot verified
TerminalsProprietary desktop platform, Proprietary web platform
Account tiersIBKR Account (Individual/Joint), Free Trial
Marketsnot verified
Record confidencehigh
Matchup-readyno — too many gaps to run a fair head-to-head

Excluded from the maths

Not verified

Not verified

Every input above traces to a source we can re-open. Nothing about Interactive Brokers is carried on the broker's word alone.

Costs less

Who beats Interactive Brokers on price

CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 74% and 89% of retail investor accounts lose money. Verify every figure with the broker before opening an account.

All sections

Language