fxbout.comFind my broker in 60s
Home/Extended field/Octa (formerly OctaFX)

Octa (formerly OctaFX) — where it wins, where it loses

Octa (formerly OctaFX) wins on headline spread. It loses on no tier-1 entity. Priced across ten round-turn EUR/USD lots it comes 10 of 17 in this field.

$60.00Cost per 10 lots — the cheapest in the field runs $10.00
0.60pEUR/USD figure the comparison is priced from
0Tier-1 entries of 3 licence rows
$25Minimum to open, where the broker states one

Column by column

The split

Two lists, no averaging. A broker that takes a column outright appears on the left of it; one that gets beaten on a column appears on the right. Nothing is scored into a single number, because a single number hides which side you actually care about.

Wins on

  • headline spread

Loses on

  • no tier-1 entity

Cost per 10 lots is the EUR/USD spread cost of ten round-turn standard lots at the figure above, commission excluded. Where a broker publishes a "from" spread rather than an average, the comparison inherits that limitation — see the unconfirmed list further down.

Licensing

Which entity, which regulator, which number

Tier decides how much weight a licence carries in any safety column. Each row links to the page it was read from.

Octa (formerly OctaFX) — licence rows on file
RegulatorNumberJurisdictionTierEntityRead from
CySEC372/18CyprusTier 2Octa Markets Cyprus Ltdcysec.gov.cy
FSCAFSP 51913South AfricaTier 2Octa Markets (Pty) Ltdwikifx.com
FSA Saint Vincent and the Grenadines (company registration)19776 IBC 2011Saint Vincent and the GrenadinesTier 3Octa Markets Incorporatedforexbrokers.com.co

Checkable

Facts the comparison runs on

On the record

  • Worth knowing when you compare: octa's account comparison page lists a $25 minimum deposit across OctaTrader, MT4 and MT5 accounts.
Comparison inputs
Trading since2011
Basenot verified
Minimum to open$25
Leverage capup to 1:1000 (offshore entity); 1:30 retail under CySEC
EUR/USD0.60 pips
TerminalsOctaTrader, MT4, MT5
Account tiersOctaTrader, MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4
Record confidencemedium
Matchup-readyyes — enough public cost data to run a head-to-head

Excluded from the maths

Not verified

Not verified

These fields are not confirmed. They are shown as gaps, not filled in, and they do not feed any column of the matrix:

  • headquarters city is missing, so it is excluded from every comparison on this page.
  • exact legal name of the FSCA-licensed entity is missing, so it is excluded from every comparison on this page.
  • maximum leverage per entity is missing, so it is excluded from every comparison on this page.
  • founding year 2011 relies on secondary sources plus Octa's own '15+ years in the market' claim is missing, so it is excluded from every comparison on this page.

Costs less

Who beats Octa (formerly OctaFX) on price

CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 74% and 89% of retail investor accounts lose money. Verify every figure with the broker before opening an account.