Structured comparison · last re-checked 2026-09
Drovix vs. Single-prime setup (one bank/PoP feed, one mark-up, separate reporting)
Drovix (MU) Ltdnot examined · Evidence score 78/100last re-checked 2026-09
78Evidence score/100
not examinedVenues
see recorded fieldsConnectivity
see recorded fieldsAsset classes
01
Licence, read on the register
Tier classification follows the same scale as the retail register: tier-2 means real supervision and client-money segregation, without an investor compensation scheme — never misread it as tier-1 protection.
| Regulator | Licence number | Jurisdiction | Tier | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial Services Commission (Mauritius) | not published · authorised · checked 2026-09 | MU | tier-3 | https://opr.fscmauritius.org/ords/opr/r/fsc-opr/fsc-online-public-register-opr |
Source: drovix.com · open source ↗
02
The comparison ledger
Where the model wins, where it merely competes, and which claims a counterparty can actually test.
A
Wins where
- Multi-asset books running size under one account — aggregation plus cross-margining attacks spread and reconciliation together
- Prop desks sensitive to rejects and latency — routing and co-location are the actual product
- Brokers consolidating a prime here and a bridge vendor there into one relationship (MT5 bridge, no re-platforming)
B
Merely competes where
- Clean, small, majors-only flow — a tight all-in single-prime quote can still be cheaper at that size
C
Testable claims
- Internal execution target <1ms on the C++/Aeron stack, measurement boundary disclosed (internal only; client RTT network-dependent)
- Active-active failover across four Equinix venues with redundant cross-connects
- 99.9% uptime SLA target, published as a target rather than a guarantee
- Per-fill TCA export (spread captured, slippage vs mid, fill ratio, time-to-fill) in machine-readable form
D
Claims we cannot verify from outside
- LP count (15+) and fill ratios are the venue's own measurement
- Internalisation quality ('zero market impact' routing) is observable only inside the portal
03
Perimeter and coverage
| Asset classes | Venues | Connectivity | Clients accepted | Explicitly refused |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| not examined | not examined | not examined | not examined | not examined |