Tiếng ViệtVI
fxbout.comĐánh giá sự đánh đổiTìm broker của tôi trong 60 giây
Trang chủ/So sánh/FXCM vs Swissquote

FXCM vs Swissquote

FXCM versus Swissquote: Accessibility and Cost Against Pedigree.. Chín thuộc tính, mỗi thuộc tính được quyết định bởi một con số công khai, với người thắng được đánh dấu.

3 FXCM1 hòa1 Swissquote
FXCM logo

FXCM

London, UK · thành lập. 1999 · 2× Tier-1

VS
Swissquote logo

Swissquote

Gland, Switzerland · thành lập. 1996 · 2× Tier-1

W1.30 pips
EUR/USD spread
1.70 pips
W$50
Minimum deposit
$1,000
2 of 4 live licences
Giấy phép Tier-1
2 of 2 live licences
WFCA, CySEC, ASIC, None
Regulatory reach
FINMA, FCA
WTrading Station, MT4, TradingView, Capitalise.ai, Mobile apps
Platform choice
MT4, MT5, CFXD/Advanced Trader, Swissquote web and mobile
Standard, Active Trader, Professional
Các cấp tài khoản
Standard, Premium, Prime, ProfessionalW
27 yrs (est. 1999)
Years trading
30 yrs (est. 1996)W
1:30 (UK/EU retail)
Maximum leverage
1:30 (UK/EU retail); up to 1:100 (Swiss entity)
London, UK
Headquarters
Gland, Switzerland

Ai thắng ở điểm nào.

Năm vòng, mỗi vòng một sự thật có thể kiểm chứng

Một vòng sẽ thuộc về broker nào dẫn đầu về con số quyết định. Khi các con số khớp nhau, vòng đó sẽ hòa — chúng tôi không tự ý tạo ra người thắng.

VòngFXCMSwissquoteThắng bởi
Cost1.30 pips1.70 pipsFXCM
Trust2 of 4 live licences2 of 2 live licencesDrawn
Access$50$1,000FXCM
PlatformsTrading Station, MT4, TradingView, Capitalise.ai, Mobile appsMT4, MT5, CFXD/Advanced Trader, Swissquote web and mobileFXCM
Record27 yrs (est. 1999)30 yrs (est. 1996)Swissquote
01

Cost

Decided by the tighter EUR/USD spread. Lower typical spread on the tightest retail account wins.

FXCM
02

Trust

Decided by the count of Tier-1 licences. More Tier-1 regulators means stronger client-money protection.

Hòa
03

Access

Decided by the lower minimum deposit. A lower bar to entry wins.

FXCM
04

Platforms

Decided by the breadth of terminals offered. More supported trading platforms wins.

FXCM
05

Record

Decided by the longer operating history. A longer operating record wins.

Swissquote
Kết luận.

FXCM edges it, 3–1

FXCM ahead of Swissquote on the computed rounds

Both FXCM and Swissquote are established brokers, founded in 1999 and 1996 respectively, with headquarters in major financial centres. Both provide access to MetaTrader 4 (MT4) platform. A key distinction immediately emerges in their headline figures: FXCM offers a typical EUR/USD spread of 1.3 pips and a minimum deposit of $50, making it more accessible. Swissquote, conversely, presents a wider typical EUR/USD spread of 1.7 pips and a significantly higher minimum deposit of $1000, suggesting a different target demographic and operational cost structure.

In the trust round, FXCM holds two active tier-1 licences (FCA and ASIC) and one active tier-2 licence (CySEC), alongside an active tier-3 unregulated offshore entity. Swissquote operates with two active tier-1 licences (FINMA and FCA), possessing no tier-2 licences. Cost comparisons reveal FXCM's typical EUR/USD spread at 1.3 pips is tighter than Swissquote's 1.7 pips. Furthermore, FXCM's minimum deposit of $50 is substantially lower than Swissquote's $1000. Maximum leverage for retail clients in UK/EU is 1:30 for both, though Swissquote offers up to 1:100 via its Swiss entity.

FXCM takes the cost round, offering a tighter typical EUR/USD spread of 1.3 pips and a considerably lower minimum deposit of $50, making it more appealing for retail traders. On regulatory strength, both present strong tier-1 credentials through FCA, with FXCM also having ASIC and Swissquote having FINMA. FXCM's additional tier-2 CySEC licence offers broader EU reach. While Swissquote provides higher leverage through its Swiss entity, its higher entry barrier limits broader appeal. FXCM emerges as the more accessible and cost-effective choice for a wider range of traders.