fxbout.comTìm broker của tôi trong 60 giây
Trang chủ/So sánh/Pepperstone vs IC Markets

Pepperstone vs IC Markets

Australia's two raw-spread specialists, fact by fact. Chín thuộc tính, mỗi thuộc tính được quyết định bởi một con số công khai, với người thắng được đánh dấu.

4 Pepperstone0 hòa1 IC Markets
Pepperstone logo

Pepperstone

Melbourne, Australia · thành lập. 2010 · 3× Tier-1

VS
IC Markets logo

IC Markets

Sydney, Australia · thành lập. 2007 · 1× Tier-1

W0.60 pips
EUR/USD spread
0.62 pips
WNo minimum
Minimum deposit
$200
W3 of 7 licences
Giấy phép Tier-1
1 of 3 licences
WFCA, ASIC, CySEC, BaFin, DFSA, CMA, SCB
Regulatory reach
ASIC, CySEC, FSA
WMT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView
Platform choice
MT4, MT5, cTrader
Standard, Razor
Các cấp tài khoản
Standard, Raw Spread
16 yrs (est. 2010)
Years trading
19 yrs (est. 2007)W
1:30 (retail, EU/UK)
Maximum leverage
1:30 (retail) / 1:500 (offshore)
Melbourne, Australia
Headquarters
Sydney, Australia

Ai thắng ở điểm nào.

Năm vòng, mỗi vòng một sự thật có thể kiểm chứng

Một vòng sẽ thuộc về broker nào dẫn đầu về con số quyết định. Khi các con số khớp nhau, vòng đó sẽ hòa — chúng tôi không tự ý tạo ra người thắng.

VòngPepperstoneIC MarketsThắng bởi
Cost0.60 pips0.62 pipsPepperstone
Trust3 of 7 licences1 of 3 licencesPepperstone
AccessNo minimum$200Pepperstone
PlatformsMT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingViewMT4, MT5, cTraderPepperstone
Record16 yrs (est. 2010)19 yrs (est. 2007)IC Markets
01

Cost

Decided by the tighter EUR/USD spread. Lower typical spread on the tightest retail account wins.

Pepperstone
02

Trust

Decided by the count of Tier-1 licences. More Tier-1 regulators means stronger client-money protection.

Pepperstone
03

Access

Decided by the lower minimum deposit. A lower bar to entry wins.

Pepperstone
04

Platforms

Decided by the breadth of terminals offered. More supported trading platforms wins.

Pepperstone
05

Record

Decided by the longer operating history. A longer operating record wins.

IC Markets
Kết luận.

Pepperstone edges it, 4–1

Pepperstone ahead of IC Markets on the computed rounds

Pepperstone and IC Markets grew up in the same Australian raw-spread tradition, and on execution the two are genuinely close. Both quote EUR/USD from roughly six-tenths of a pip on their tightest accounts, both run MT4, MT5 and cTrader, and both are built around the ECN-style pricing that active traders ask for. The separators are regulation and entry cost, not the trading engine.

Pepperstone holds the wider regulatory spread — FCA in the UK, ASIC in Australia and BaFin in Germany all sit in Tier-1 — where IC Markets leans mainly on its ASIC licence with CySEC and an offshore Seychelles arm behind it. Pepperstone also lets you open with no minimum deposit, while IC Markets asks for $200 to start. For a UK or EU trader who wants the strongest home-regulator cover and a low bar to entry, that combination is hard to look past.

IC Markets earns its following on raw pricing and deep liquidity, and traders running high volume through cTrader will find little to complain about. But on the facts that decide this page — more Tier-1 licences and a $0 minimum — Pepperstone takes the fees and trust rounds, and the accessibility round is a dead heat only because both platforms are otherwise so similar.