Tiếng ViệtVI
fxbout.comĐánh giá sự đánh đổiTìm broker của tôi trong 60 giây
Trang chủ/So sánh/IG Group vs Capital.com

IG Group vs Capital.com

IG vs Capital.com: Spread parity, regulatory divergence.. Chín thuộc tính, mỗi thuộc tính được quyết định bởi một con số công khai, với người thắng được đánh dấu.

4 IG Group1 hòa0 Capital.com
IG Group logo

IG Group

London, UK · thành lập. 1974 · 7× Tier-1

VS
Capital.com logo

Capital.com

London, UK · thành lập. 2016 · 2× Tier-1

0.60 pips
EUR/USD spread
0.60 pips
WNo minimum
Minimum deposit
$20
W7 of 7 live licences
Giấy phép Tier-1
2 of 6 live licences
WFCA, FCA, BaFin, FINMA, ASIC, MAS, NFA/CFTC
Regulatory reach
FCA, CySEC, CySEC, ASIC, SCA, SCB
WProprietary web platform, MT4, ProRealTime, L2 Dealer, Mobile apps
Platform choice
Capital.com proprietary web platform, MT4 (selected entities), TradingView, Mobile apps
WCFD, Spread betting, Share dealing, Professional
Các cấp tài khoản
Retail CFD, Spread betting (UK), Professional
W52 yrs (est. 1974)
Years trading
10 yrs (est. 2016)
1:30 (UK/EU retail)
Maximum leverage
1:30 (UK/EU retail)
London, UK
Headquarters
London, UK

Ai thắng ở điểm nào.

Năm vòng, mỗi vòng một sự thật có thể kiểm chứng

Một vòng sẽ thuộc về broker nào dẫn đầu về con số quyết định. Khi các con số khớp nhau, vòng đó sẽ hòa — chúng tôi không tự ý tạo ra người thắng.

VòngIG GroupCapital.comThắng bởi
Cost0.60 pips0.60 pipsDrawn
Trust7 of 7 live licences2 of 6 live licencesIG Group
AccessNo minimum$20IG Group
PlatformsProprietary web platform, MT4, ProRealTime, L2 Dealer, Mobile appsCapital.com proprietary web platform, MT4 (selected entities), TradingView, Mobile appsIG Group
Record52 yrs (est. 1974)10 yrs (est. 2016)IG Group
01

Cost

Decided by the tighter EUR/USD spread. Lower typical spread on the tightest retail account wins.

Hòa
02

Trust

Decided by the count of Tier-1 licences. More Tier-1 regulators means stronger client-money protection.

IG Group
03

Access

Decided by the lower minimum deposit. A lower bar to entry wins.

IG Group
04

Platforms

Decided by the breadth of terminals offered. More supported trading platforms wins.

IG Group
05

Record

Decided by the longer operating history. A longer operating record wins.

IG Group
Kết luận.

IG Group edges it, 4–0

IG Group ahead of Capital.com on the computed rounds

IG Group and Capital.com, both London-headquartered, present a head-to-head with notable similarities and distinctions. Both brokers quote an identical typical EUR/USD spread of 0.6 pips and adhere to the 1:30 maximum leverage for UK/EU retail clients. Their account type offerings are also largely comparable, including CFD and Spread Betting. However, IG Group, founded in 1974, is significantly older than Capital.com, established in 2016. Furthermore, IG Group offers a $0 minimum deposit, while Capital.com requires $20. IG also provides a broader suite of platforms beyond MT4 and proprietary options.

In terms of trust and cost, the brokers diverge. IG Group demonstrates superior regulatory breadth, holding 7 active tier-1 licences and no tier-2 licences. Capital.com, while holding 2 active tier-1 licences, supplements these with 3 active tier-2 licences. Both brokers maintain the same typical EUR/USD spread of 0.6 pips, making them competitive on trading costs. However, IG Group offers a $0 minimum deposit, providing greater accessibility, whereas Capital.com requires a minimum of $20. Maximum leverage for retail clients is 1:30 for both, showing no difference in this regard.

Considering the facts, IG Group secures the trust round with its substantially larger number of tier-1 regulatory licences. The cost round is split, with both offering a 0.6 pip EUR/USD spread, but IG's $0 minimum deposit makes it more accessible for new traders compared to Capital.com’s $20. IG also provides a more extensive platform selection, including ProRealTime and L2 Dealer, alongside MT4 and proprietary options. Capital.com, while robust, cannot match IG's established regulatory depth and lower entry barrier. Therefore, based on verified facts, IG Group emerges as the stronger choice.