Tiếng ViệtVI
fxbout.comĐánh giá sự đánh đổiTìm broker của tôi trong 60 giây
Trang chủ/So sánh/IUX (IUX Markets) vs FBS

IUX (IUX Markets) vs FBS

IUX versus FBS: Offshore Leverage, Regulatory Strength, and Trading Costs. Chín thuộc tính, mỗi thuộc tính được quyết định bởi một con số công khai, với người thắng được đánh dấu.

1 IUX (IUX Markets)1 hòa3 FBS
IUX (IUX Markets) logo

IUX (IUX Markets)

Ebene Cybercity, Mauritius · thành lập. 2016 · 1× Tier-1

VS
FBS logo

FBS

Belize City, Belize · thành lập. 2009 · 0× Tier-1

0.90 pips
EUR/USD spread
0.70 pipsW
$200
Minimum deposit
$5W
W1 of 4 live licences
Giấy phép Tier-1
0 of 2 live licences
WASIC, FSCA, FSC Mauritius, FSA Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Mwali International Services Authority (MISA), Comoros
Regulatory reach
CySEC, FSC Belize
MT5, IUX web platform, IUX mobile app
Platform choice
MT4, MT5, FBS Trader app
Standard, Pro, Raw, Cent
Các cấp tài khoản
Standard, Cent, Pro, Crypto
10 yrs (est. 2016)
Years trading
17 yrs (est. 2009)W
up to 1:3000 (offshore entities; Raw and Pro accounts)
Maximum leverage
up to 1:3000 (Belize entity); 1:30 retail under CySEC
Ebene Cybercity, Mauritius
Headquarters
Belize City, Belize

Ai thắng ở điểm nào.

Năm vòng, mỗi vòng một sự thật có thể kiểm chứng

Một vòng sẽ thuộc về broker nào dẫn đầu về con số quyết định. Khi các con số khớp nhau, vòng đó sẽ hòa — chúng tôi không tự ý tạo ra người thắng.

VòngIUX (IUX Markets)FBSThắng bởi
Cost0.90 pips0.70 pipsFBS
Trust1 of 4 live licences0 of 2 live licencesIUX (IUX Markets)
Access$200$5FBS
PlatformsMT5, IUX web platform, IUX mobile appMT4, MT5, FBS Trader appDrawn
Record10 yrs (est. 2016)17 yrs (est. 2009)FBS
01

Cost

Decided by the tighter EUR/USD spread. Lower typical spread on the tightest retail account wins.

FBS
02

Trust

Decided by the count of Tier-1 licences. More Tier-1 regulators means stronger client-money protection.

IUX (IUX Markets)
03

Access

Decided by the lower minimum deposit. A lower bar to entry wins.

FBS
04

Platforms

Decided by the breadth of terminals offered. More supported trading platforms wins.

Hòa
05

Record

Decided by the longer operating history. A longer operating record wins.

FBS
Kết luận.

FBS edges it, 3–1

FBS ahead of IUX (IUX Markets) on the computed rounds

Both IUX and FBS offer high maximum leverage up to 1:3000 through their offshore entities, catering to traders seeking aggressive capital efficiency. Their platform offerings include MT5, with FBS additionally providing MT4. Headline figures reveal FBS with a tighter typical EUR/USD spread at 0.7 pips compared to IUX's 0.9 pips. Minimum deposits show a stark contrast; FBS requires only $5, while IUX sets its entry at $200. This indicates different accessibility thresholds for new traders.

In the trust round, IUX holds a distinct advantage with one active Tier-1 licence (ASIC) and one Tier-2 licence (FSCA). FBS, conversely, possesses zero active Tier-1 licences but one active Tier-2 licence (CySEC). IUX's FSA Saint Vincent and the Grenadines listing is a company registration, not an investment licence, a detail for prospective clients to note. For cost, FBS wins with its 0.7 pips typical EUR/USD spread and a $5 minimum deposit, significantly more accessible than IUX's 0.9 pips and $200.

IUX takes the trust round due to its active ASIC Tier-1 licence, providing a higher level of regulatory oversight. FBS clearly wins the cost round, offering a tighter spread and a substantially lower minimum deposit. While both provide high leverage options, FBS's accessibility makes it appealing for those with smaller capital. The choice ultimately depends on priority: IUX for enhanced regulatory security, or FBS for more favourable entry costs and spreads. Both present valid propositions based on their verified facts.