
IUX (IUX Markets)

FBS
Who wins on what
Five rounds, one checkable fact apiece
A round goes to whichever broker is ahead on its deciding figure. Where the figures match, the round is drawn — we do not invent a winner.
Cost
Decided by the tighter EUR/USD spread. Lower typical spread on the tightest retail account wins.
Trust
Decided by the count of Tier-1 licences. More Tier-1 regulators means stronger client-money protection.
Access
Decided by the lower minimum deposit. A lower bar to entry wins.
Platforms
Decided by the breadth of terminals offered. More supported trading platforms wins.
Record
Decided by the longer operating history. A longer operating record wins.
FBS edges it, 3–1
Both IUX and FBS offer high maximum leverage up to 1:3000 through their offshore entities, catering to traders seeking aggressive capital efficiency. Their platform offerings include MT5, with FBS additionally providing MT4. Headline figures reveal FBS with a tighter typical EUR/USD spread at 0.7 pips compared to IUX's 0.9 pips. Minimum deposits show a stark contrast; FBS requires only $5, while IUX sets its entry at $200. This indicates different accessibility thresholds for new traders.
In the trust round, IUX holds a distinct advantage with one active Tier-1 licence (ASIC) and one Tier-2 licence (FSCA). FBS, conversely, possesses zero active Tier-1 licences but one active Tier-2 licence (CySEC). IUX's FSA Saint Vincent and the Grenadines listing is a company registration, not an investment licence, a detail for prospective clients to note. For cost, FBS wins with its 0.7 pips typical EUR/USD spread and a $5 minimum deposit, significantly more accessible than IUX's 0.9 pips and $200.
IUX takes the trust round due to its active ASIC Tier-1 licence, providing a higher level of regulatory oversight. FBS clearly wins the cost round, offering a tighter spread and a substantially lower minimum deposit. While both provide high leverage options, FBS's accessibility makes it appealing for those with smaller capital. The choice ultimately depends on priority: IUX for enhanced regulatory security, or FBS for more favourable entry costs and spreads. Both present valid propositions based on their verified facts.
Next matchup
Other head-to-heads
Pepperstone vs IC Markets
Australia's two raw-spread specialists, fact by fact
XM vs Exness
Two low-deposit giants weighed on cost and cover
OANDA vs FOREX.com
Two of the most heavily regulated names, compared
FxPro vs Pepperstone
London platform depth against Melbourne's tighter quote